Thailand
While its 2023 elections were comparatively open and competitive, Thailand's leading opposition party, Move Forward, was blocked from forming a government by the military-appointed Senate. Press freedom remains constrained, due process is not guaranteed, and there is impunity for crimes committed against activists.
Research & Recommendations
Thailand
| PR Political Rights | 11 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 23 60 |
Overview
Following five years of direct military rule, Thailand transitioned to a military-dominated, semielected government in 2019. Protests calling for further democratic reform in 2020 and 2021 prompted authorities to use repressive tactics including arbitrary arrests, intimidation, lèse-majesté charges, and harassment. While 2023 elections were comparatively open and competitive, the leading opposition party, Move Forward, was blocked from forming a government by the military-appointed Senate and subsequently dissolved by the Constitutional Court. The second-largest opposition group, the Pheu Thai Party (PTP), entered government in coalition with several military-aligned parties, but its initial prime minister was later removed by the same court over an alleged ethics violation, signaling the continued dominance of the country’s unelected institutions. Press freedom remains constrained, due process is not guaranteed, and there is impunity for crimes committed against activists.
In countries where democratic forces have come to power after periods of antidemocratic rule, the new governments should pursue an agenda that protects and expands freedoms even as it delivers tangible economic and social benefits to citizens.
These countries must act swiftly to release all political prisoners, build or revitalize democratic institutions, reform police and other security forces, organize and hold competitive multiparty elections, and ensure accountability for past human rights violations.
In countries where there has been significant erosion of political rights and civil liberties, policymakers, legislators, jurists, civic activists, and donor communities should work to strengthen institutional guardrails and norms that serve to constrain elected leaders with antidemocratic or illiberal aims.
Thailand
| A Obstacles to Access | 17 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 14 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 8 40 |
Political Overview
Following five years of direct military rule, Thailand transitioned to a military-dominated, semielected government in 2019. Protests calling for further democratic reform in 2020 and 2021 prompted authorities to use repressive tactics including arbitrary arrests, intimidation, lèse-majesté charges, and harassment. While 2023 elections were comparatively open and competitive, the leading opposition party, Move Forward, was blocked from forming a government by the military-appointed Senate and subsequently dissolved by the Constitutional Court. The second-largest opposition group, the Pheu Thai Party (PTP), entered government in coalition with several military-aligned parties, but its initial prime minister was later removed by the same court over an alleged ethics violation, signaling the continued dominance of the country’s unelected institutions. Press freedom remains constrained, due process is not guaranteed, and there is impunity for crimes committed against activists.
Freedom of expression online has been and is increasingly under attack as governments shut off internet connectivity, block social media platforms, and restrict access to websites that host political, social, and religious speech. Protecting freedom of expression will require strong legal and regulatory safeguards for digital communications.
Governments should encourage a whole-of-society approach to fostering a high-quality, diverse, and trustworthy information space. The Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online identifies best practices for safeguarding the information ecosystem, to which governments should adhere.
Comprehensive data-protection regulations and industry policies on data protection are essential for upholding privacy and combating disproportionate government surveillance, but they require careful crafting to ensure that they do not contribute to internet fragmentation—the siloing of the global internet into nation-based segments—and cannot be used by governments to undermine privacy and other fundamental freedoms.
For decades, Thailand has served as a haven for people escaping war and political repression in countries throughout Southeast Asia and the broader region. However, protection for individuals from foreign governments in Thailand is limited and ad hoc.
Like-minded governments and international organizations should work together to highlight the threat of transnational repression and establish international norms for addressing it.
This includes agreeing on a common definition of transnational repression, and prohibiting the use of Interpol notices on their own to deny immigration or asylum benefits or conduct arrests.
Among other tactics, governments should deploy a robust strategy for targeted sanctions against perpetrators of transnational repression.