Thailand
While its 2023 elections were comparatively open and competitive, Thailand's leading opposition party, Move Forward, was blocked from forming a government by the military-appointed Senate. Press freedom remains constrained, due process is not guaranteed, and there is impunity for crimes committed against activists.
Research & Recommendations
Thailand
| PR Political Rights | 11 40 |
| CL Civil Liberties | 22 60 |
Overview
Following five years of direct military rule, Thailand transitioned to a military-dominated, semielected government in 2019. While 2023 elections were comparatively open and competitive, the leading opposition party, Move Forward, was blocked from forming a government by the military-appointed Senate and subsequently dissolved by the Constitutional Court. The second-largest opposition group, the Pheu Thai Party (PTP), entered government in coalition with several military-aligned parties, but two successive PTP prime ministers were removed by the same court over alleged ethics violations in 2024 and 2025, signaling the continued dominance of the country’s unelected institutions. Press freedom remains constrained, due process is not guaranteed, and there is impunity for crimes committed against civic activists.
Democratic resilience will increasingly depend on stronger coordination among countries that share a commitment to freedom, the rule of law, and accountable governance.
International support for democratic institutions, civil society, and independent media has been associated with modest but meaningful improvements in democratic governance, and it is far less costly than the military outlays necessitated by rising authoritarian aggression.
Young people are increasingly dissatisfied with democracy—not because they reject its principles, but because they see institutions failing to deliver on them. Programmatic work should create clear pathways for meaningful political participation, from voting and policy engagement to community organizing and public leadership, so that young people can translate their expectations into agency.
Thailand
| A Obstacles to Access | 17 25 |
| B Limits on Content | 14 35 |
| C Violations of User Rights | 8 40 |
Political Overview
Following five years of direct military rule, Thailand transitioned to a military-dominated, semielected government in 2019. Protests calling for further democratic reform in 2020 and 2021 prompted authorities to use repressive tactics including arbitrary arrests, intimidation, lèse-majesté charges, and harassment. While 2023 elections were comparatively open and competitive, the leading opposition party, Move Forward, was blocked from forming a government by the military-appointed Senate and subsequently dissolved by the Constitutional Court. The second-largest opposition group, the Pheu Thai Party (PTP), entered government in coalition with several military-aligned parties, but its initial prime minister was later removed by the same court over an alleged ethics violation, signaling the continued dominance of the country’s unelected institutions. Press freedom remains constrained, due process is not guaranteed, and there is impunity for crimes committed against activists.
Access to the internet is under threat as authoritarian powers continue to create barriers for people to freely express themselves online. Internet shutdowns, throttling, and platform blocking remain among the most common tools of digital repression. At the same time, digital technologies serve as a lifeline for people seeking to expose human rights violations to the outside world and hold dictators accountable.
Protecting privacy online is essential to safeguarding free expression in repressive contexts. Without strong privacy protections, journalists and human rights defenders may self-censor out of a fear of reprisal. Rapid advances in AI—and the growing threat of automated vulnerability exploitation—heighten these risks, leaving civil society organizations increasingly vulnerable to sophisticated cyberattacks.
For decades, Thailand has served as a haven for people escaping war and political repression in countries throughout Southeast Asia and the broader region. However, protection for individuals from foreign governments in Thailand is limited and ad hoc.
Like-minded governments and international organizations should work together to highlight the threat of transnational repression and establish international norms for addressing it.
This includes agreeing on a common definition of transnational repression, and prohibiting the use of Interpol notices on their own to deny immigration or asylum benefits or conduct arrests.
Among other tactics, governments should deploy a robust strategy for targeted sanctions against perpetrators of transnational repression.